Κυριακή 25 Οκτωβρίου 2026

Georgios Papadopoulos, Dictator

 

 

 

Georgios Papadopoulos                      ΓΕΩΓΙΟΣ ΠΑΠΑΔΟΠΟΥΛΟΣ

Born 5 May 1919 in Achaia                Died 27 June 1999 in Athens

 

 

 


Section Five, Number 435

Georgios Papadopoulos was a Greek military officer who, on April 21, 1967, led a bloodless coup in Greece. He swiftly named himself the country's Prime Minister, a post held until 1973 when, after a rigged plebiscite, he abolished the Greek monarchy and declared himself President of the Greek Republic.  That was a few short months before the infamous November 17 Polytechnic student uprising which gave his co-conspirator, hardliner Dimitrios Ioannides, the opportunity to oust him and place him under house arrest where he remained until the junta’s botched attempt to back a coup d'état in Cyprus caused the whole house of cards to collapse. Democracy was miraculously restored when a deus ex machina in the person of former Prime Minister Constantinos Karamanlis returned from exile on July 24, 1974 to lead the country.

How a rather ordinary group of middle echelon army officers led by colonel Giorgios Papadopoulos managed to take centre stage and oust democratically elected officials, get the king on board, anesthetize the misgivings of the majority of the population while ruthlessly suppressing dissent, is a cautionary tale. This drama unfolded in a country with a rich history of coups, a monarchy that often miss-stepped or overstepped, and where concepts of loyalty to the ‘nation’ did not necessarily mean loyalty to the state.


 

His Life

Georgios began life in the small village of Eliochoro, Achaia.  He was the eldest son of the local school master, Christos and his wife Chrysoula. When he completed high school in Patras in 1937, he enrolled in the Hellenic Military Academy (Σχολή Ευελπίδων) and graduated in the summer of 1940, in time to defend the country in the Italo-Greek war of 1941. He was 22 years old.

 


The young soldier

As a second lieutenant of the artillery, he fought against the Italians and against the Germans when they invaded the country in April 1941. The king, many politicians, and a tiny fraction of the army (1) immediately fled into exile. Since there was no longer a Greek army to belong to, Papadopoulos enrolled in the university to study civil engineering. He never did complete his studies nor did he join any of the many resistance groups that formed during the occupation. Instead he sat out much of the occupation working for the ‘Patras Food Supply Office’ which was under the aegis of the Greek puppet administration.

While in Patras, it is believed he joined the notorious Greek Security Battalions (2) which had been formed in 1943 by quisling prime minister Ioannis Rallis. The aim was to counter the rising power of leftist and communist guerrillas fighting under the banner of EAM-ELAS.


 

Rallis (on the right) had made the formation of these battalions a condition of accepting office.

 

In early 1944, with the help of the British, Papadopoulos went to Egypt and joined the Greek army in exile as a lieutenant. That same year he helped in the formation of IDEA, The Sacred Association of Nationalist Officers, an anti communist group within the army who were well disposed towards those officers who had joined the Security Battalions in occupied Greece. IDEA promoted their being integrated into the nationalist army after the liberation, glossing over the fact they were working directly under the command of the Nazis because they regarded them as the likeliest group able to counter the communist threat that EAM-ELAS posed to the pre war status quo. (3)

Middle Echelon Army Officers, Loyalties, and the ‘Communist Threat’

There are explanations for the mindset of men like Papadopoulos and his 16 co-conspirators. The milieu they grew up in was an era of army coups. Between 1922 and 1935 there had been 7 coups or coup attempts; 5 had been spearheaded by the army. This chaos was followed by the Metaxas dictatorship with its emphasis on law and order, rigid anticommunism, and anti-political bias, all ideas that went down better in conservative rural communities than in the more socially diverse cities. Almost all of the future conspirators did come from poor rural families. One of them, Ioannis Ladas, said: We were all so poor that we called Papadopoulos the rich man because his father was a school teacher. (4).

For men of their social class without the political ties that might have secured them advancement in civil life, a military career offered the best chance for upward mobility. Once enlisted, these middle echelon officers became part of a remarkably cohesive social group.(5)  That they had a ‘sacred’ duty to defend the nation was instilled in all officers during training. That ‘nation’ did not always mean the Greek state with its volatile and often warring politicians.(6)   To them, the possibility of a future coup to ‘save the nation’ would not have seemed like much of a stretch.(7)

The Return (October 18, 1944)

Papadopoulos was promoted to captain in 1946, fought during the civil war and was decorated twice for his effort.  He became a major in 1949.  His already visceral anti-communism would have been reinforced and vindicated in his own mind by the anti-communist stance of the Greek government during the nineteen fifties.


 

Papadopoulos during the civil war

Papadopoulos from 1950 to 1967

In 1951 Papadopoulos participated in the now notorious court-martial of communist leader Nikos Beloyannis. At the time, the Communist Party of Greece was a banned organization and anti-communist feelings ran high.(8)  


 

Papadopoulos (under the arrow) with the military tribunal prosecuting Beloyannis.

During the 1950s, he underwent military training in the United States which has given rise to theory that he was, in fact, a CIA agent. Greece had been under American influence since 1947. He certainly would have fit right into the 1950’s CIA mindset.  In 1959, he was appointed to the KYP Intelligence Service, the CIA’s Greek equivalent and acted as its liaison with the CIA’s John Fatseas.  


 

Papadopoulos (left) with CIA operatives John Fatseas (third from left) and George Stevens (third from right) on a wild boar hunt.

 

1963 - 1967: Politics Gets Complicated – Again

If the politics in the country had remained stable in the 1960s, Papadopoulos  might have served his time, retired, and been grumbling about wrong-headed politicians in his local coffee shop. Greece had been stable under the conservative government of Constantinos Karamanlis.(9)

 


Karamanlis in 1963

His ERE (National Radical Union) party governed from 1955 to 1963. But then Karamanlis resigned in 1963, forcing early elections in November of the same year.  In that election, social democrat Georgios Papandreau’s Center Union party won 138 seats to Karamanlis’ 132.  That meant that the 28 seat EDA (Union of the Democratic Left), the socialist party perceived to be a communist front, would have a swing vote in the new parliament.  Papandreau called for new elections in February 1964 and won his majority but the political pot continued to boil: the Cyprus issue, communist fears, concerns as to whether Greece’s alignment towards Europe was a good or bad move, all simmered in the background.


 

Georgios Papandreau

Georgios Papandreau had already been leery enough of Papadopoulos to post him to Thrace, far away from any army plots brewing in the capital. While there, Papadopoulos arrested two soldiers under his command along with some local leftists, claiming that they had conspired to sabotage army vehicles by putting sugar into their gas tanks.


 

An Athens Newspaper with the story of Sabotage on June 13, 1965

The suspects were arrested and tortured until it was discovered that it had been Papadopoulos himself who sabotaged the tanks in an effort to prove that communists were infiltrating the army.

In a twist that could only happen in Greece where loyalties and patronage ties can be very complicated indeed, Georgios Papandreau forgave him because their fathers had been school mates in Achaia!(10)

 

 The Colonels Begin to Gather in Athens…

Papadopoulos was recalled, first to Larissa and then to the Army General Staff in Athens. Several of his future co-conspirators would also be favoured by appointments in Athens. Then Papadopoulos was promoted to the rank of colonel - just in time for his coup. The coup was triggered by the prospect of yet another election in 1967, but the ‘finger’ had been hovering over the trigger for some time.  

 The Coup: April 21, 1967

The coup, when it came, was bloodless and the king was persuaded to go along with it at first.

 


King Constantine in the midst of the conspirators, Papadopoulos is on the left.

If he and his co-conspirators could only be blamed for bad prose and simplistic ideas it might have been farcical. But they were in earnest; house arrests of politicians, banishments of leftists or supposed leftists to islands or abroad, the torture of dissidents, and ridiculous restrictions on long hair and long skirts began immediately. Nor did they fail to play the religious card. The Orthodox Church was promised the biggest church in the Balkans under the junta slogan: Greece for Greek Christians. (11)  The king had second thoughts almost eight months later, made a belated effort to overthrow the regime, failed, and went into exile.

As Western democracies waffled trying to figure out how Greece’s fate affected their own geopolitical aims, Papadopoulos did his best to convince Greeks that the country was sick and that therefore ‘shackling the patient to the operating table for his own good’  was just common sense.  Early on he had erased farmers’ debts, which went a long way to creating support in rural communities. He touted a rise in prosperity as a junta achievement. The symbol of his ‘make Greece great again’ was one Trump might envy: a phoenix rising from the ashes – fronted by a soldier. It wasn’t subtle but it was ubiquitous.

 


Every town Square in Greece quickly became April 21st Square.

Why did people stand for it? Inertia, fatigue, the hope for a respite from political infighting, self interest (especially among the wealthy), business fears - all played their part and maybe just the feeling that the army somehow had the right to interfere every now and then. After all, democracy had always bounced back before. Roads were being built and villages electrified for the first time.

It did not take the United States long under Richard Nixon to decide that the Papadopoulos’ government was one they could ‘do business with’. Meanwhile, the co-conspirators did very well for themselves. Papadopoulos took up residence in a rather grand estate in Lagonissi with his former lover Despina Gaspari whom he married in 1970.


 

Georgios ,Despina, and friends

There was resistance both in and outside of Greece.(12)  In 1968 Alexandros Panagoulis attempted to blow him up as his limo made its way into Athens from Lagonissi.

.


Panagoulis under arrest. He suffered torture and humiliation.  See.

https://athensfirstcemeteryinenglish.blogspot.com/2023/01/alexandros-alekos-panagoulis.html

 

The Beginning of the End

Papadopoulos, under pressure, began to make a few moves to loosen the reins. But the reforms he attempted were blocked by his co conspirators, Dimitrios Ioannidis in particular. His decision, the same year, to make Greece a republic with himself as the figure at the helm was resented both by his co-conspirators and by his ‘base’ in the army.

Meanwhile, abroad, resistance or sympathy for resistance was rising.  (The Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, and Denmark had been anti-junta from the get go). Local resistance among young people culminated in the Student uprising of November 17, 1973 which was quashed violently with tanks. Hardliner Demitrios Ioannidis took over the reins and put Papadopoulos under house arrest.

 


Tanks arriving at the Polytechnic University

Ioannides initiated even more oppression and it is hard to know how it all would have ended if the Junta had not supported a coup in Cyprus which led to Turkey’s invasion of the island. The Junta’s effort to call up civilians and prepare for war was so chaotic that even they realized they were in trouble. (13)  They were persuaded to disband themselves and invite Constantinos Karamanlis to return and lead the nation out of chaos.



The Return

 

The Aftermath

The monarchy was abolished by a referendum in December 1974, democracy was reinstated, and all the conspirators arrested and tried for high treason. In August 1975, Papadopoulos and others were sentenced to death (later commuted to life in prison) but he never recanted; he even rejected an amnesty offer that would have required him to recant. He was a true believer. He remained in prison until a cancer diagnosis caused his transfer to an Athens hospital where he died three years later on June 1999.

He was buried in the First Cemetery under the following epitaph: 

 

GEORGIOS PAPADOPOULOS, PRESIDENT OF THE GREEK DEMOCRACY


 

Well!

 

An  Afterword

Collaboration is not an aberration; it’s the resisters who are exceptional. (14)

Not many people alive today who lived through the dictatorship will claim they were pro junta or acquiescent, and yet many were. That urge to ‘go with the flow’ and make do or self-censure oneself when dictators take over is frightening to behold in retrospect and hard to watch when it is actually happening. Whether or not America was behind the coup is an issue for many who blame the United States for the entire mess. November 17, the anniversary of the student uprising, is a national holiday and always ends with a march to the U.S. embassy.

Today, hardly anyone makes a trek, annual or otherwise to Papadopoulos’ grave.

The Grave

 


Section Five, Number 436

The Map

 

Footnotes

(1)  The vast majority of the mainland troops were cornered, surrendered, or simply demobilized and sent home.

(2)  Papadopoulos’ boss in Patras had been responsible for forming the Security Battalions in Achaia. 

(3)  The fact that so many members of the Security Battalions were, in fact, integrated into the army after liberation is still a contentious issue in Greece.

(4)  The fathers of seven of the co-conspirators were farmers, two were school masters; only one had been previously in the military. Ioannidis may be the exception because his family was relatively wealthy. The army attracted far more rural recruits than the navy.

(5)   Four of the future co conspirators graduated in 1940, eight in 1943 and most were of field grade rank.

(6) For an excellent explanation of the difference between the perception of  nation and the state, see The Nation, the State and the International System, the Case of Modern Greece by Andreas Psomas, Athens 1978.

 (7) There is a very extensive website listing all of the coups, counter coups and failed coups in modern Greece. It is a long read.

 (8)  Beloyannis was sentenced to death but the sentence was not carried out until a second trial in 1952 where he was declared guilty and, immediately after the verdict, shot. Papadopoulos was not involved in this second trial.

(9) Under Karamanlis, many laws suppressing communists and left wing views had remained on the books. In the eyes of conservatives, the communist threat was always there.

(10) Some have gone as far as to say that Georgios Papadopoulos was a god son of Papandreau – not completely implausible since Greek politicians frequently acted as god fathers for constituents in order to ensure their votes.

 (11) The mega church promised by Georgios Papadopoulos was a colossal, never-built monument known as the Tama tou Ethnous (Vow of the Nation). Designed to sit atop the Tourkovounia hills in Athens, the junta government collected millions in public funds for this massive project, but it was ultimately abandoned and never built.

 (12) The resistance of Melina Mercouri, Andreas Papandreau, and Mikis Theodorakis makes inspiring reading.

(13) Ioannidis named Greek general Phaidon Gizikis president and it was this general who would gather together various political figures after the Turkish invasion who would invite Karamanlis to return.

(14) Collaboration is not an aberration; it’s the resisters who are exceptional Alice Jolly

Sun 16 Nov 2025 13.00 CET

 

Sources

http://www.protagon.gr/apopseis/editorial/i-mnimi-o-mythos-i-lithi-44341396292  

http://www.keeptalkinggreece.com/2017/04/21/the-economic-scandals-of-the-greek-military-junta-21-april-1967/

The Military and Society in Greece by  James Brown

The Nation, the State and the International System, the Case of Modern Greece by Andreas Psomas, Athens 1978,

https://www.thenationalherald.com/the-greek-junta-and-the-other-americans/

https://www.kathimerini.gr/culture/books/928267/i-galanoleyki-sti-skia-tis-asteroessas/

https://stratistoria.wordpress.com/1944/07/18/19440718-picme-greek-security-battalions/

The Rise and Fall of the Greek Colonels by C.M. Woodhouse, Franklin Watts, 1985

The Greece of Karamanlis, by Maurice Genevoix,  Doric Publications, 1972

 

Κυριακή 7 Ιουνίου 2026

Elizabeth Pierce Blegen, Archaeologist

 

 

Elizabeth Pierce

            Born June 26, 1888                             Died September 21, 1966


 

Row 13 in the Protestant Section of the First Cemetery

 

Yes, all the constituents were there: separate, and unsynthesized – waiting for a catalyst (1)

When thinking of the life of Elizabeth “Libbie” Pierce Blegen, the word that comes to mind is “catalyst”, not so much in its meaning as an entity causing reactions without altering because I am sure that she did change over time, but more in the sense of a person who precipitates events without seeming to be the mover herself. 

If her mentor Ida Thallon had not seen a promising young student and entered into a romantic relationship with her and had not wanted Elizabeth to experience life as she had once experienced it at the American School of Classical Studies at Athens, Carl Blegen would not have met Elizabeth and fallen head over heels in love with her. He wanted her in his life so badly that he persuaded his friend and mentor Bert Hodge Hill (then director of the ASCSA) to make a move that would clear the way to his marrying Elizabeth by marrying Ida. Carl then proposed that they all live together as a Quartet. 

It was 1924.

 


 

 

Her Life

Elizabeth Denny Pierce was born on June 26, 1888 in Allegheny Pennsylvania. Her parents, Flora McKnight and William Lemmex Pierce, were of Gaelic descent and proud enough of it to use their forebears’ last names as each of their four children’s middle names.  Elizabeth (Libbie) grew up with three brothers.  She received her AB from Vassar in 1910 and her Masters in Latin in 1912 when she was 22. While a first year student at Vassar, Elizabeth had studied Latin in a class taught by Ida Thallon, a classicist 13 years her senior.  Ida would become her friend and mentor and would introduce Elizabeth to the classical world.  

Following in the footsteps of Ida, Elizabeth did further graduate studies (including Greek architecture and sculpture), at the Faculty of Political Science at Columbia University between 1912 and 1915 before returning to Vassar in 1915 as an assistant curator of the Vassar Art Museum which had opened its doors in 1865.

 

The Vassar Art Museum

Vassar believed that fine art was so important to a well rounded education that a gallery for original works and reproductions was included in the original building design.  Their collection was created before any public museum of art had opened its doors in the United States.  Fine art was deemed a ‘manifestation of moral truth’ and, as if to emphasize that, the founders placed their gallery next to the chapel.  Well before Elizabeth’s time, elective courses in art history were opened to all Vassar students for college credits. As the collection grew, new buildings were required.  When Elizabeth became assistant curator in 1915, the collection was housed in Taylor Hall.

 


Taylor Hall

 In 1918, Elizabeth also became an instructor of Fine Arts at the college.

 

Ida and Elizabeth and their Boston Marriage

The term Boston Marriage was coined after Henry James had described such a relationship in his novel The Bostonians. It was a close and abiding relationship between two financially independent women who chose to live together and perhaps not marry at all. At that time, the belief that educated women should eventually marry was firmly entrenched in college circles too. The ‘moral and patriotic’ education provided was supposed to spread beyond each graduate in her future role as wife and mother (2). Perhaps it had not occurred to many at the time that financially independent women might have other goals….

Ida and Elizabeth lived in adjoining rooms at Vassar and formed just such a partnership. It was not uncommon amongst women who were college graduates and very common in these all female campuses where so many graduates returned to teach. Educated women in the general workforce, with the exception of teachers and secretaries, were thin on the ground until after the First World War, and even then…

 

Elizabeth Attends the ASCSA, Writes a Paper, and Meets Carl Blegen

Ida Thallon had enjoyed her two years at the American School of Classical Studies at Athens between 1901 and 1903. In fact they had been an impetus for her increasing interest in the new science of archaeology and how it related to her own field of history. She and Elizabeth set out for Greece in 1921 to explore and with the idea that Elizabeth might like to join the ASCSA for the school year of 1922-3. Elizabeth did. She believed the School offered an opportunity for her to ‘study material first hand’ as an aid to her teaching back home.

 


Elizabeth and Ida in 1920

Her classmates were congenial and the subjects interesting. There was even a course in modern Greek. The School’s director Bert Hodge Hill taught ancient architecture and the assistant director, 34 year old Carl Blegen taught prehistory and general topography. 

 


Carl (left) and Bert in 1915

Carl had just completed his book on Korakou, a site in Corinth which had revealed to him and his co-excavator, Alan Wace, a history and chronology for the fascinating prehistoric people who would coalesce into Mycenaeans and the Greeks of the classical period. It was groundbreaking work in the exciting new field of Greek prehistory; an era that could only be understood by digging since no written records existed. (3)

 

Carl’s book on Korakou can be read on line today

 

Elizabeth herself was still working to complete her Phd dissertation on Gaius Asinius Pollio a writer and historian who had hobnobbed with Julius Caesar and then retired to write histories and plays. 

                      Her 1922 book can be bought on Amazon or read on line today 

 As worthy a subject as Pollio was, I am venturing into speculation by guessing that continuing to add a few more footnotes to the well trodden path of Roman history (which she was doing so well) could not have held a candle to myths seeming to come alive and the exciting prehistoric finds at Korakou, Corinth, and elsewhere being revealed and discussed in class by the excavator himself.   

While at the School, students were encouraged to take on a project of their own.  Elizabeth therefore prepared a small paper on A Daedalid in the Skimatari Museum in Boeotia.

 

 






Elizabeth’s daedalid was a little the worse for wear , but it was a start (4)

 

In her paper, she wonders if the similarity of such figures across much of the Greek world indicated an awareness of the Daedalus myth itself or even if there might have been a Cretan school of such art that then spread to the Peloponnese and farther.

 

 


A typical daedalic figure. Who knew they would eventually morph into those beautiful kourai and kouroi with their archaic smiles?

 

It is a very nice, compact analysis, very suited to her own research talents and begins with the statement that people used to think there was no truth to Greek myths…. So already she is thinking along the lines of Carl Blegen who did not necessarily believe wholeheartedly in Homer the way Schliemann did, but did believe such writings were a perspective on real happenings.

Meanwhile, Carl was taking a close look at Elizabeth, and he was smitten. He proposed marriage. Elizabeth first accepted and then reneged, partly perhaps because she did have an offer of an internship at the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York, but mostly because of Ida. They had been partners for some time and the thought of abandoning her was crushing, although Ida had given her blessing and was prepared to step aside.

It was Carl who came up with the cunning plan:  Bert would marry Ida, Elizabeth would marry him, and all four create a ‘pro par’ (professional partnership) relationship that would offer a great deal of freedom to the women to enjoy their time and travels together and yet would allow them to work well as a functioning team.  The Athenian Quartet was formed.

 

The Rest

It proved to have been a brilliant idea and did not offend the mores of the time. In that most collaborative and fascinating of sciences, here were four kindred spirits who could work together, discuss archaeology together, help each other in their endeavours and, all the while, be in touch with and in the thick of the latest archaeological discoveries in Greece.

It did turn out to be ‘dream team’. If there were bumps along the way, the final result was a smooth running collaboration. Eliazabeth and Ida were in a position to catalogue, examine, and even excavate the myriad pottery finds of Carl’s excavation in Prosymna and later Troy and finally at Nestor’s palace in Pylos. Ida helped Bert by cataloguing the terra cottas from the Corinth excavations and encouraging the one member of the team who was not adept at publishing to finish the papers on his long Corinth excavations which he had not managed to do by 1924. (5) 


This procrastination would eventually cause him to be removed as director of the ASCSA. But Carl would continue under the aegis of the University of Cinninati and Bert under the University of Pennsylvania in Cyprus and the connection with the ASCSA would never be severed because Carl would often work in association the School and Elizabeth had bought a house at 9 Ploutarchou Street in Kolonaki, close to the ASCSA. (6)  Their home became a centre for archaeologists of every nationality to meet and a spot where every American diplomat sent to Athens would have been delighted to be invited for a meal and interesting conversation.

It is interesting to note that no member of the pro pars seemed to have been diminished by the other’s accomplishments. Ida continued to write and publish until she died in 1954 while on board a ship returning her and Elizabeth to Greece.  Bert did eventually publish his Corinth findings and proved helpful to other archaeologists following in his footsteps while also excavating in Cyprus. If Carl was the star it was because of his excavations and observations in Korakou, Prosymna, Troy, and finally Pylos. Elizabeth helped in every instance.

Nor was she merely an acolyte.  From 1925 to 1952, Elizabeth wrote  A Newsletter from Greece, articles which were published in the American Journal of Archaeology with analyses and tidbits of information that would have been of interests to professionals in the field as well as to the public at large. She was well placed to offer news and insights. One 1946 article  that can be found on line was entitled News Items from Athens in which she describes the state of Athenian museums after the war, how the statues in the National Archaeological Museum were buried under the floor during the war, and how they fared once retrieved:

 


 

 

We also learn that the Mycenaean gold was placed in the vaults of the Bank of Greece during the war and that many statues of the Acropolis museum were cemented into surrounding caves for the duration.

I know I would have been one of the people awaiting her next article!

Apparently Elizabeth was also always ready to help a fellow archaeologist  research an item in a  Greek museum. Her help on the spot must have been invaluable.

Elizabeth, as did Carl, Bert, and Ida, took part in the life of Athens. She served as an officer of The American Women’s  Association of Greece, and the Hellenic American Women’s club, and was a member of the American Association of University women, the American Historical Association and the Archaeological Institute of America.

Elizabeth suffered a debilitating stroke in 1956 that left her in a wheelchair. Undaunted, she continued to assist Carl at Pylos.

She died in September 21, 1966 and is buried in the Protestant section of the First cemetery of Athens.  

The Blegens’ headstone is one of the most beautiful in the cemetery and one of the most apt.

 

The Grave

 


Row thirteen in the Protestant Section of the First Cemetery

 

The Map

 

 


 

Footnotes

(1)  Colin Dexter

 (2).   The professed aim of this gallery for the women attending Vassar was: to promote national identity and individual morality while fostering the ability to make informed visual distinctions and acquire the cultivated taste that young women could pass on to their children and communities. See https://www,vassar.edu/art/history.

(3)  Linear B script had not been deciphered and would not be until 1952. Even then, although it provided fascinating insights like the fact that that the Mycenaeans called their animals names like Dapple or Blossom, it was not adequate for an historical narrative.

(4) Her paper was published in the American Journal of Archaeology, Vol. 28, No. 3 (Jul. - Sep., 1924) and can be read online.

(5)  Bert’s Corinth papers were finally published in 1964, well after his death.


 (6)  Elizabeth left the house to the  ASCSA in the event of all of their deaths.


         

9 Ploutarchou Street is today the seat of the J.F. Costopoulos Foundation which promotes Greek Culture and Arts within and outside of Greece

 

Sources

The best source for the entire Quartet is the ASCSA itself.  They are very generous with their on line Information. Archaeologist Natalia Vogeikoff-Brogan  and her wonderful From the Archivist's Notebook  offers a wealth of information  about the school and its archives. See https://nataliavogeikoff.com From the Archivist's Notebook

https://www.brown.edu/Research/Breaking_Ground/bios/Blegen_Elizabeth%20Pierce.pdf

https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.2307/499458?journalCode=aja

https://www.jstor.org/stable/499458